THE FRAUD OF CLERK, CATHERINE O HAGAN WOLFE
MISSING LEDGER NUMBERS
AS CAN BE SEEN WITH THE DOCUMENTS BELOW, MISSING NUMBERS 6, 20, 21,25, 28, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 40
NUMBERS SCRAMBLED OUT OF PLACE
31- 35- 41 - 38 - 39 - 42.... DOES THAT SOUND RIGHT TO YOU ?
REQUIRING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
WHY IS MY NOTICE OF APPEARANCE REQUIRED WHEN I AM THE SOLE COMPLAINANT, SOLE APPELLANT AND PRO SE, WHEN MEANWHILE THE CLERK, WOLFE, AND THE DEFENDANTS ARE SERVING ME AS SHOWN BELOW IN LAURA ETINGERS LETTER, PAGE 2 ?
CLAIMING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE NOT EXECUTED
I DONT HAVE TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.FURTHERMORE, WHEN WOLFE CLAIMS I DIDNT SERVE THE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, I DID BECAUSE THE DEFENDANTS WERE ECF. NOTE LAURA ETINGERS LETTER BELOW, PAGE 2.
STRIKING MY NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
WOLFE STRUCK MY NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BECAUSE SHE CLAIMED THAT I DIDNT SERVE THEM THOUGH I PROVIDED PROOF OF MAILING. REGARDLESS, HOW CAN YOU STRIKE A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE WHILE EVERYONE HAS ACCEPTED THE FACT THAT I HAVE APPEARAED AND WAS SERVING ME ??!?!?!
REJECTING MY $ 505. DOLLAR PAYMENT
WOLFE CLAIMED I SHOULD HAVE SENT THE 505. DOLLAR APPEALS PAYMENT TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT WHERE THE CASE CAME FROM RATHER THAN TO APPEALS COURT WHERE THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO. IF YOU ARE PAYING FOR YOUR APPEAL AND LITIGATING NOW IN APPEALS COURT AND HAVE TO PAY 505 DOLLARS TO DO SO WHO WOULD YOU PAY ? APPEALS COURT RIGHT ? MAKE SENSE ? NO. NOT TO WOLFE. SHE CLAIMED I SHOULD HAVE SENT 505 DOLLARS TO WHERE THE CASE CAME FROM RATHER THAN THE COURT OF WHICH IT WAS TRANSFERRED TO WHICH MAKES NO SENSE.