MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAMON E. REYES, THE MONESTER.....

JUDGES RAMON REYES, HECTOR GONZALEZ AND BRENDA SANNES IGNORED ECF MOTION FILED BY ROBERT MALEK ALMOST A YEAR AGO !!! ( KEEP IN MIND, THE US GOVERNMENT ALWAYS FUNCTIONS AS A DECEPTIVE FRAUD, POINTING TO PROGRAMS, POLICIES, LAWS, ETC. THAT IN REALITY DO NOT EXIST ) AS WE KNOW, THE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS ENJOY IMMEDIATE ECF ACCESS FILING PRIVILEDGES, PROVIDING THEM WITH A TACTICAL LEGAL ADVANTAGE FOR BEING ABLE TO FILE TO THE CASE INSTANTANEOUSLY, WITH NO CLERK INTERVENTION CAUSING DELAYS AND DESTRUCTION OF THEIR FILINGS. FURTHERMORE, THE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS ARE ABLE TO FILE FOR FREE RATHER THAN HAVE TO MAIL WHICH IS THE CASE IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT. BETWEEN REYES, GONZALEZ AND SANNES, MY FILINGS WERE NEEDLESSLY REPEATEDLY DELAYED, DESTROYED AND COSTED ME OVER 1000 DOLLARS IN MAILING COSTS...

RAMON REYES ALONG WITH HECTOR GONZALEZ UPON FINDING OUT THAT THE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS WERE TRYING TO ARREST ROBERT MALEK FOR HAVING THEIR WITNESS SERVED WITH FEDERAL LAWSUIT 22 CV 6775 / 22 CV 855, WHICH INVOLVED THE CITY OF NEW YORK ALONG WITH ACS COMMITTING THE LARGEST FINANCIAL CRIME UPON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY, TO THE TUNE OF 26 BILLION DOLLARS ALONG WITH FALSIFYING MEDICAL PSYCHE RECORDS TO KIDNAP CHILDREN FROM THEIR PARENTS AND TRAFFIC THEM THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, REYES ALONG WITH GONZALEZ WHEN PRESENTED WITH THE MATTER OF THE CLERKS DESTROYING AND DELAYING MY FILNGS , RATHER THAN PROVIDE ECF ACCESS TO PACER AND THE CASE LIKE THE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS, DECIDED TO ORDER ME TO MAIL ALL FUTURE FILINGS FOR ALL CASES WHICH WILL COST ME TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND RATHER THAN SOLVE A PROBLEM, EXACERBATE THE PROBLEM. MORE IMPORTANLY, IT PLACES ME IN A POSITION OF CAPTURE SINCE NOW, WITH ALMOST DAILY MAILINGS, THE DEFENDANTS I AM LITIGATING AGAINST, WILL KNOW I WILL BE AT A FEDEX, UPS OR POSTAL SERVICE FACILITY, DAY IN, DAY OUT....

FOR THE FULL STORY ON THE WANTED ISSUE, GO TO THE WANTED PAGE AND VIEW FEDERAL FILING OF WHICH THE ENTERING WAS DELAYED BY THE CLERKS FOR 8 DAYS WITH THE CLERKS FALSIFYING THE RECORDS AND STATING 7 DAYS.  22 CV 7815 IS THE CASE NUMBER. GO TO THE WANED PAGE...

JUDGE RAMON REYES, JUDGE BRENDA SANNES AND JUDGE GONZALEZ ALL SET UP ROBERT MALEK FOR ARREST WITH THE CITY GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS. THE SITUATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ON THE WANTED PAGE IS THAT FOR ALMOST AN ENTIRE YEAR I WAS FILING LETTERS AND SUBPOENA UPON CASE NUMBER 22 CV 5416 FOR MARGARET INGOGLIA TO BE SERVED. ACS HAD ACCEPTED SERVICE FOR MARGARET INGOGLIA AS DEFENDANT IN 22 CV 5416 WHERE SHE AND THEM WERE DEFENDANTS. NOTE THAT MARGARET INGOGLIA IS A 2X ARTICLE 10 LOSS RECIPIENT FOR ABUSE OF HER SON AND ALSO 2 MORE INDICATEDS FOR NEGLECT OF HER SON AND MY DAUGHTER, EDUCATIONAL NEGLECT AND CHRONIC ILLNESS / INADEQUATE GUARDIANSHIP. THIS PIECE OF GARBAGE OF A HUMAN WAS GIVEN CUSTODY OF MY DAUGHTER RESULTING IN HER MASSIVE AMOUNT OF ABUSE AS SHOWN ON ACS COMPLAINTS.COM. MARGARET INGOGLIA WAS LIVING WITH HER SON AND OUR DAUGHTER IN A CITY OF NEW YORK / ACS RUN FACILITY WITH " ADDRESS CONFIDENTIAL. " 

SINCE ACS WAS WITH ME AND OTHER PARENTS INVOLVED WITH SECRET ISSUANCE OF ORDERS OF PROTECTIONS, I KNEW THAT HAVING HER SERVED WHERE SHE LIVED WAS A CAN OF WORMS I WANTED NO PART OF. 

REGARDLESS, ACS HAD ACCEPTED SERVICE AND FURTHERMORE, LEGALLY, THEY HAD TO. SO HERE, ON FEDERAL CASE NUMBER 22 CV 5416, ACS DECIDES TO CLAIM THEY WILL NOT ACCEPT SERVICE AND THE JUDGES, ALL 3 OF THEM SAY ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I WRITE LETTERS. I ISSUE A SUBPOENA FOR HER ADDRESS AND IT IS ALL IGNORED. I FILED PROOF OF SERVICE VIA ACS. ALL TO NO AVAIL... 

AT THIS POINT WITH SERVICE OF MARGARET INGOGLIA BEING IN EFFECTED SINCE 3 JUDGES IGNORED THE MATTER FOR MORE THAN A YEAR ON THIS CASE, I HAD NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO HAVE HER SERVED BY LICENSED PROCESS SERVER ON CASE NUMBER 22 CV 855 / 22 CV 6775 AFTER THE 3 FEDERAL JUDGES ORDERED ME TO DO SO.

I USED THE ADDRESS  FOR MARGARET INGOGLIA THAT ACS HAD PROVIDED TO ME IN NOVEMBER OF 2022 OF WHICH THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE. 

WHEN I SERVED THE 22 CV 855 CASE ON MARGARET INGOGLIA VIA PROCESS SERVER, WITH THE ADDRESS THAT ACS HAD PROVIDED ( OF COURSE WHICH THEY NEVER TOLD THE NYPD OR MARGARET INGOGLIA ) WITHIN APPROX. 30 DAYS I GET A CALL FROM DET. THIMOTE REGARDING ME BEING WANTED.... APPARENTLY FOR VIOLATING AN ORDER OF PROTECTION THAT I WAS NEVER SERVED WITH, STALKING FOR AN ADDRESS OF WHICH I WAS PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS, THEMSELVES...

SO IN SUMMARY, WE HAVE ACS WHOM ACCEPTED SERVICE FOR MARGARET INGOGLIA AND THEN DECIDED TO REJECT IT. 3 JUDGES THAT IGNORE THE SITUATION FOR ALMOST A YEAR. 3 JUDGES THAT IGNORE MY PLEAS FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ADDRESS SINCE ACS HAD HER " HIDDEN " IN ONE OF THEIR FACILITIES, 3 JUDGES THAT ORDER ME TO SERVE LEAVING ME NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO SERVE WITH THE INFORMATION I WAS PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS THERMSELVES OF WHICH THEY USED TO FRAME ME TO PUT ME IN JAIL FOR HAVING SUCH ADDRESS AND VIOLATING AN ORDER OF PROTECTION OF WHICH THEY NEVER SERVED AND FALSELY INDICATED TO NYPD THAT IT WAS.... 3 FEDERAL JUDGES THAT NOT JUST FAILED TO INTERVENE TO STOP THE DEFENDANTS FOR ARRESTING ME FOR ABIDING BY FEDERAL COURT ORDERS BUT THE JUDGES ACTUALLY AS CAN BE SEEN TOOK PART IN THIS SETUP, CREATING THE PERFECT STORM OF CONSPIRACY AND FRAUD.

HOW DID JUDGE REYES ALONG WITH GONZALEZ ADDRESS THE MATTER OF THE CLERKS DESTROYING AND DELAYING HARDCOPY AND ELECTRONIC FILINGS ALONG WITH FALSIFYING RECORDS ? MERELY SEND FUTURE FILINGS BY MAIL ( WHICH I HAD ALREADY DONE WITH RESULTS NOTED ABOVE... ) 

JUDGE REYES MADE NO EFFORT TO LOCATE MISSING SUBPOENA NOR EVEN READ THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS OF 1/1/2023. THE ELECTRONIC SUBPOENA TRANSMISSION WAS DESTROYED ON 12-09-2022 AND THE HARD COPY WAS RECEIVED ON 12-15-2022. THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WAS ELECTRONICALLY UPLOADED ON 1-11-2022 AND DESTROYED. IT WAS RECEIVED VIA MAIL ON 12-15-2022, NOT 12-19-2022 AS FASELY CLAIMED BY THE CLERKS. THE CLERKS THEN ENTERED THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OF 12-20-2022. JUDGE REYES AS OF 1-1-2023 ALONG WITH JUDGE GONZALEZ NEVER BOTHERED TO READ THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOR SEARCH FOR THE SUBPOENA EITHER. THESE WERE CRITICAL FILINGS IN REGARDS TO THE FRAUDULENT CRIMINAL PROSECUTION BY THE CITY OF NEW YORK FOR SERVING FEDERAL PROCESS AS ORDERED BY REYES, SANNES AND GONZALEZ...

JUDGE REYES ALONG WITH JUDGE GONZALEZ AND JUDGE SANNES CONSISTENTLY IGNORED EVERYTHING I WOULD FILE. FOR JUDGE REYES AND JUDGE GONZALEZ THE ONLY FILING THEY RESPONDED TO FROM ME WAS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS AS THEY WERE GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ME. OUTSIDE OF THAT, EVERYTHING I FILE IS  IGNORED AND I HAVE ABSOLUTE EVIDENCE OF WHICH I WILL NOT DIVULGE AT THIS TIME THAT NEITHER REYES NOR GONZALEZ MADE ANY ATTEMPT TO LOOK OR SEARCH FOR THE 2ND MISSING SUBPOENA ON THIS CASE AND FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS AND COUNTING NOW, NEVER EVEN READ OR CONSIDERED THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.